PLOS One Add us as a preferred source on Google

X @plosone

🔄 Data last refreshed 2 months ago

🤝

Make a deal with PLOS One

👋 Unclaimed listing — auto-generated from public data; rates are estimates, not set by the creator. 🔒 Paid proposals held safely in escrow — released only when the work's approved.

This is an unclaimed, auto-generated listing. It was built only from PLOS One’s publicly available X information. PLOS One has not claimed, verified, or endorsed it, and is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or a partner of SocialDB — no partnership or endorsement is implied, and any prices shown are estimates, not set by the creator.

✓ Is this you? Claim it 🗑 Remove this listing

Followers

124.1K

Posts

16.5K

Following

2.2K

Account age

17 yrs

💰 Suggested sponsorship rate

🎁 Free analysisfor PLOS One

🕵️Fake Followers CheckReal-audience % & bot risk→ 📊Engagement rateBenchmarked vs. peers→ 💰What they chargeFair sponsored-post price→

📊 Activity & format

Posting cadence

0.05 / week

A lower-frequency account — each post lands with more weight.

Content mix

Mostly images

Recent: 0 video · 9 image · 9 text.

Follower / following

57×

Follows 2.2K back. A strong ratio — an audience that follows them, not a follow-for-follow network.

Recent posts

View on X ↗

@GidMK Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We are going to look into these concerns and investigate this case further internally. ❤ 71🔁 3 Good news for #ScientistsWhoSelfie: Research shows scientists who post selfies are perceived as significantly warmer, and potentially more trustworthy. Show us your selfies! ❤ 171🔁 85 We want to extend our apologies to the trans and gender variant community and others affected by the shortcomings of the initial review. PLOS is an inclusive, open and non-discriminatory publisher that deeply cares for the concerns of this… ❤ 183🔁 53 We recognize that issues with the study should have been addressed prior to publication. We have and will learn from the case, and since have completed an internal restructure so that we can better support our Editorial Board &are bett… ❤ 103🔁 11 Although the study represents a valid contribution to the scientific literature, its framing, given its limit to parental observations, needed to be corrected and clarified. A Formal Comment by a member of our Editorial Board provides furt… ❤ 70🔁 23 After consideration of the scientific concerns raised to us, @PLOSONE has corrected the study on gender dysphoria in adolescents and young adults. The decision was made after post-publication review by additional experts. ❤ 340🔁 135 Most UK scientists who publish extremely highly-cited papers do not secure funding from major public and charity funders, new study finds #healthresearchfunding ❤ 63🔁 44

Why does the #zebra have stripes? New research suggests that this age-old question may have a simple answer related to a tiny nuisance... #wildlife #africanwildlife #zebrastripes #Equusquagga https://t.co/K6kN3Sl31L ❤ 91🔁 66 At PLOS ONE, we recognise the importance of negative results as a crucial piece of the scientific puzzle #scidata18 ❤ 65🔁 24 “Biomaterials, biomedical devices, and our expertise in 3D printing of biomaterials for biomedical devices are some of the most important emerging areas in science and technology”-Michael McAlpine, Guest Editor for our #Biomaterials collec… ❤ 389🔁 140

From tissue engineering to 3D printing, Guest Editors Aldo Boccaccini, @KHamadLab, Michael McAlpine & Jie Song are inviting interdisciplinary researchers to submit to our #biomaterials #CallForPapers. Submit #OpenSource tools,protocols… ❤ 209🔁 80

Researchers from #Italy investigate the tools used by "Ötzi"' the Tyrolean Iceman which reveals he travelled throughout the alps but was not a skilled flintknapper https://t.co/5VrDdXK29K ❤ 70🔁 38

💡 Facts

🗓️Joined X in 2009 — 17 years ago.

📤Posts about 0.1× per week.

💬0.24% engagement rate.

🏅Earned the 100K Followers for passing 100K followers.

🕵️ Fake follower check

Estimated

52/100

Fair Credibility score

82%

Real Real audience

Low Fake-follower risk

High Data confidence

Est. 82% real, active audience · Low fake-follower risk.
Limited engagement data — score uses the signals available.
Organic base — far more followers than accounts it follows.
Established account (17+ years old).
0.24% engagement — below the ~2.2% typical for this size.

Heuristic estimate from engagement, follower ratios, account age & growth — a screening signal, not a guarantee.

About

PLOS One is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online science publication.

📸 Gallery

🔀 Audience overlap

Estimated

Estimated shared audience with similar creators — useful for avoiding overlap (or doubling down) when planning a campaign.

chris melberger 15%

Sulia 🌺 🩵 15%

Gladys Berejiklian 12%

kyle daiñel estrada 11%

International Hockey Federation 10%

TVアニメ「魔王学院の不適合者　～史上最強の魔王の始祖、転生して子孫たちの学校へ通う～」 10%

More like this

Find more →

X ＋

International Hockey Federation ✓

TVアニメ「魔王学院の不適合者　～史上最強の魔王の始祖、転生して子孫たちの学校へ通う～」

Frequently asked questions

How much does PLOS One charge for a sponsorship?

PLOS One hasn't published fixed prices yet. Send a proposal through SocialDB and agree terms directly — your payment is held in escrow until the work is approved.

How do I contact PLOS One for a brand deal or collaboration?

Send a paid deal or collab request right here on SocialDB — we notify PLOS One, and once they accept, your payment is held safely in escrow and released when the work is approved. You don't need to track down an email.

How many followers does PLOS One have?

PLOS One has 124,131 followers on X.

PLOS One Add us as a preferred source on Google

Make a deal with PLOS One

📊 Activity & format

Recent posts

💡 Facts

🕵️ Fake follower check

About

📸 Gallery

🔀 Audience overlap

More like this

Frequently asked questions

✉ Message PLOS One

🎤 Event / appearance with PLOS One

PLOS One isn't on SocialDB yet